Supreme Court: Approval to the government to maintain the security of Mukesh Ambani, the Center appealed

by

hear the news

The central government has got approval to maintain the security of industrialist Mukesh Ambani and his family. Actually, the Central Government had challenged a decision of the Tripura High Court in the Supreme Court. During the hearing of the case, the Supreme Court has given this approval to the Central Government.

A bench of CJI NV Raman, Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Hima Kohli heard the appeal of the Central Government against the order of the High Court. After this, the bench allowed the Center to maintain the security of the Ambani family. Earlier on June 29, a vacation bench had stayed the orders of the High Court.

The High Court had issued two orders on May 31 and June 21 on Vikas Saha’s public interest litigation, seeking information from the central government on the basis of which security was provided to the Ambani family. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, told the bench that petitioner Vikas Saha from Tripura had nothing to do with the security provided to the Ambani family in Mumbai.

The bench said that there is no need to hear such a petition. Especially when the Ambani family is paying for the security expenses themselves. The court asked the lawyer appearing for the petitioner Vikas Saha that what is the justification for filing your petition in this matter? Why are you worried about security? This is someone else’s safety issue.

Senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for the Ambani family, said that the petition challenging the security arrangement to the Ambani family is unfortunate and the family is meeting the security expenses on its own.

How to break the chains of court policy: Supreme Court
In another case, the Supreme Court termed the imposition of GST on wheelchairs and other equipment for the disabled as a serious matter. Also said that how to break the shackles of court policy. A bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna was told by advocate Jay Dehraj that after the court’s direction in October 2020, the petitioner has made his presentation before the ministry concerned. However, GST was imposed. This makes it difficult for many differently-abled people to get moving equipment. For example, 5 per cent GST has been levied on wheel chair, which has increased its cost further. Same is the case with Braille paper.

The lawyer said that no tax is levied on an able-bodied person for walking, but equipment of the disabled is being taxed. To this the bench said, “We understand that this is a serious matter and your point is worth considering in public interest.” We had earlier also sought the help of the Attorney General in this matter. The problem is how can we break the shackles of policy. We may also have to deal with GST on other medical devices, the bench said. The bench will now hear the matter on September 14.

Expansion

The central government has got approval to maintain the security of industrialist Mukesh Ambani and his family. Actually, the Central Government had challenged a decision of the Tripura High Court in the Supreme Court. During the hearing of the case, the Supreme Court has given this approval to the Central Government.

A bench of CJI NV Raman, Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Hima Kohli heard the appeal of the Central Government against the order of the High Court. After this, the bench allowed the Center to maintain the security of the Ambani family. Earlier on June 29, a vacation bench had stayed the orders of the High Court.

The High Court had issued two orders on May 31 and June 21 on Vikas Saha’s public interest litigation, seeking information from the central government on the basis of which security was provided to the Ambani family. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, told the bench that petitioner Vikas Saha from Tripura had nothing to do with the security provided to the Ambani family in Mumbai.

The bench said that there is no need to hear such a petition. Especially when the Ambani family is paying for the security expenses themselves. The court asked the lawyer appearing for the petitioner Vikas Saha that what is the justification for filing your petition in this matter? Why are you worried about security? This is someone else’s safety issue.

Senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for the Ambani family, said that the petition challenging the security arrangement to the Ambani family is unfortunate and the family is meeting the security expenses on its own.

How to break the chains of court policy: Supreme Court

In another case, the Supreme Court termed the imposition of GST on wheelchairs and other equipment for the disabled as a serious matter. Also said that how to break the shackles of court policy. A bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna was told by advocate Jay Dehraj that after the court’s direction in October 2020, the petitioner has made his presentation before the ministry concerned. However, GST was imposed. This makes it difficult for many differently-abled people to get moving equipment. For example, 5 per cent GST has been levied on wheel chair, which has increased its cost further. Same is the case with Braille paper.

The lawyer said that no tax is levied on an able-bodied person for walking, but equipment of the disabled is being taxed. To this the bench said, “We understand that this is a serious matter and your point is worth considering in public interest.” We had earlier also sought the help of the Attorney General in this matter. The problem is how can we break the shackles of policy. We may also have to deal with GST on other medical devices, the bench said. The bench will now hear the matter on September 14.

Source link