Secret methods will not work… High Court reprimands state associations for improving Indian football

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday warned state football associations that it does not appreciate their “secret methods” of flouting court orders and it is up to them to organize the 2022 FIFA U-17 Women’s World Cup in India . The top court said that it had passed an order on August 3 and the way forward is that the Committee of Administrators (CoA) and the Union Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports to host the international tournament will be decided by the International Football Federation (FIFA) and the Asian Football Confederation. (AFC) to work with.

The Court took note of the fact that India is to host the FIFA U-17 Women’s World Cup 2022 from October 11, 2022. A bench of Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice Surya Kant and Justice AS Bopanna said that it will move the apex court against the ousted All India Football Federation (AIFF) president Praful Patel by the state football associations, the amendment applications filed by the Center and the CoA’. Listing the contempt petition filed for ‘interference in action’ for Thursday.

The bench told senior advocate Maneka Guruswamy, appearing for the state football associations, “We do not appreciate your surreptitious approach to thwart the orders of the court.” Ultimately you have to decide whether you want to organize a tournament or not. We were also watching what was happening after our last week’s order.’

Maneka said she has also filed an application and wants it to be listed along with other applications filed by other parties. He said, ‘We would also like the tournament to be held in this country. The future of our country in football depends on this tournament. The bench said it would consider all the applications on Thursday during the hearing.

Initially, senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the CoA, submitted that he has filed the contempt petition as unfortunately some disturbing incidents have taken place and he is facing “problem in implementation of the court order due to interference of one person”. which has been thrown out by this Court. He said that he found that due to this intervention the central government was also facing some pressure and he had to file an amendment application.

Source link